McDermott OKs red light camera ordinance

Font Size:

BY SUSAN BROWN
sbrown@nwitimes.com
219.836.3780 | Thursday, June 12, 2008 | (64 comment(s))

HAMMOND | Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr. on Tuesday signed off on the controversial red light camera system, making the city the first community in the state to put the program on its books.

Neither McDermott nor Hammond police Lt. Pat Vicari could be reached Wednesday to learn how soon the city plans to implement the system, where cameras take digital photos of vehicles running red lights and their license plate numbers.

Tickets are issued through the mail by the private company operating the system after a review by police. By ordinance, fines of $100 will be assessed and initially treated like parking tickets unless contested, when they become moving violations.

The plan currently calls for the system to be installed at six city intersections, three located in the Hessville area.

Police Lt. Richard Hoyda said Wednesday the targeted intersections were selected through a state-run database available to police.

"The Indiana Criminal Justice Institute has encouraged police jurisdictions to send in crash data as soon as possible," Hoyda said. "Up to 80 percent of (police departments) are reporting."

Hoyda said Vicari searched for the intersections showing the highest number of accidents, which Hoyda said indicate the places at most risk for injury.

"Red light running" legislation has failed to become law in the state of Indiana despite numerous attempts by supporters, particularly in the state Senate.

Within the last 30 days, the city of Gary has requested state Sen. Earline Rogers, D-Gary, to ask the office of Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter for an opinion on the program's legality before the city attempts to create a local ordinance as has Hammond.

On Wednesday, Councilman at large Robert Markovich said he will ask lawmakers representing Hammond to initiate a similar request.

"If we need something like that to make it legal, we need to get them moving," said Markovich, who overall supports the measure though he voted against approving the ordinance.

Markovich's objections to the ordinance had focused on the cost of running into legal hurdles.

Back to story 64 comment(s)

Please note: Comments from readers will be screened and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment perhaps:

It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
It promoted violence or illegal acts.
It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.

In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.

Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.

Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.

For more information please read our Terms of Service.

Hello wrote on Jun 19, 2008 2:39 PM:

" Where did the complainers go? I guess they have no answers to the questions presented. Good argument Team Hammond. I guess you can only accuss, not defend your accusations. Ill remember that. "

speechless wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:28 PM:

" I bet you are wet hen. "

Hoosier Transplant wrote on Jun 17, 2008 11:27 PM:

" I grew up in Hammond and now live in southern California. We have had red light cameras for over 10 years. When you receive your ticket in the mail, the driver's picture and license plate picture is sent with the ticket, along with the fine --$400 (if you decide not to appear in court and forfeit bail). Not 40.00, $400. Of this money, approximately $280 goes to company that installed the camera. What will Hammond's take be for each red light runner? By the way, traffic accidents at these intersections have been drastically reduced. "

ONCE AND FOR ALL wrote on Jun 17, 2008 9:42 AM:

" go to yahoo and search lake county assessor indiana. Go to the assessor website and click guest access. On the left side there is an option to search for owners name, click it. Now type in Indy Development. There is no such company that owns land in Hammond, let alone near Cabelas. It is very easy to prove this slanderous fellow wrong. That is why no Fed investigation has occured or ever will occur. Sorry Mr. Bitter "

ya ok wrote on Jun 17, 2008 9:31 AM:

" What you are doing is called Nit Picking. Get over yourself. Maybe you prefer McDermott Dede-nothing. Then he wouldn't have to finish anything. Thats what happened in Hammond before McDermott. We just Dede-nothing. Is that what you prefer? Can you name one accomplishment of Dedelow? How about McD Sr.? There are too many to name for Junior. Stop being ignorant of the change occuring in Hammond. It is great, and I can't wait for more. Have you seen the new old folks home going up where columbia center used to be? Do you see the new dorms going up near PUC? Do you see all of the road work going on? Get a life and stop sharing your half empty outlook on life with everyone. You are nothing more than a bitter old man. The election was 7 months ago, get over it. "

Woodmar Mall and Wonder Bread wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:48 AM:

" I recently went past the old Wonder Bread building that was supposedly being demolished and I see it is only partially demolished, much like Woodmar Mall. How many years will it stand in that condition? does the mayor finish anything he starts? "

no secret wrote on Jun 16, 2008 12:17 PM:

" its no secret that mcdermott is very, very close with the cantrell family. i find it very hard to swallow that he could be as close as he is to the cantrells without being just like them. they are the same breed, in the game for personal enrichment only. with regard to indy development llc, the secretary of state's office/web site should be able to provide some information regarding that group. Hmmmmm. "

McFan wrote on Jun 16, 2008 11:24 AM:

" I can cut and paste too.

Something is not right. The mayor initially said his father was not making a dime relative to the Cabelas deal. Then is surfaced later that he in fact made well over $900,000. Cabelas used only part of the country club land but a tax abatement was granted for the entire property. A corporation was formed, Indy Development LLC by the mayor's family and friends. They are developing the remainder of the land and get the benefit of the same tax abatement (for 30 years). Must be nice to have a son that can pressure the sale of land so that his family/friends can get rich while Hammond citizens foot the bill. Ya see boys and girls, thats what is known as profiteering under Indiana statute and it is illegal. " "

Carsons cantrell and conspiracies wrote on Jun 16, 2008 11:16 AM:

" Your theories about McD corruption are unfounded. Just like your constant rants of six figure pay offs to McD in the Cabelas deal, you are going on and on and on about how Cantrell will expose McD. You are a wishful thinker. You have no facts to back your arguments only conspiracies and accusations. You are placing McD much closer to Cantrell Sr than is actually true. You can tell me all the familial relationships in the world between canrell and McD, Doesn't mean McD is corrupt. Lots of politicals know cantrell, are all of them corrupt? You need to spend your retirement more productively. YourBeing Narcasistic "

Conspiracy YES wrote on Jun 16, 2008 9:03 AM:

" Something is not right. The mayor initially said his father was not making a dime relative to the Cabelas deal. Then is surfaced later that he in fact made well over $900,000. Cabelas used only part of the country club land but a tax abatement was granted for the entire property. A corporation was formed, Indy Development LLC by the mayor's family and friends. They are developing the remainder of the land and get the benefit of the same tax abatement (for 30 years). Must be nice to have a son that can pressure the sale of land so that his family/friends can get rich while Hammond citizens foot the bill. Ya see boys and girls, thats what is known as profiteering under Indiana statute and it is illegal. "

Linda wrote on Jun 16, 2008 8:42 AM:

" Mr. McDermott is a carpet bagger. He is out to make a name for himself and get rich. I have looked into a few of the things posted by various people on these boards and I have found most of them to be true. Look at the Times archives. Thats is just one source, there are others. "

Time Will Tell wrote on Jun 16, 2008 8:19 AM:

" McDermott is as corrupt as the day is long. He will eventually be indicted, with or with out Bob Cantrell's finger pointing. From the looks of the post declaring McCriminal a "stand up guy" somebody is a little nervous, hmmmmmm.

Carson's looks nice IN SCHERERVILLE! Maybe McDaddy can "consult" with them for half a mill. Bwaa, ha, ha ha ! "

He is alright with me wrote on Jun 15, 2008 10:21 PM:

" Hmm, McDermott is educated, he is young, respectfully good looking, he is our Mayor, and he is helping home owners send our children to college. Stop all the hate people. Let it go. We understand that we can't all have his life, but at least we can try to make the most of ours. Any time his name is mentioned in the paper, here come the haters who try to cut him down. Let it be. Stop the hate. He is not going anywhere until his term is up so deal with it. Maybe your guy lost the election to him. Deal with it. If people think poorly of our town, why bother to read the articles and comment on them? I'm sure you have a boatload of worries in your own city. Are you a little sore because maybe you moved out in haste and can't benefit from the College Bound program? Poor Baby! LOL "

fire fighter scott rokas wrote on Jun 14, 2008 11:41 PM:

" TEEL THE MAYOR'S DAD TO PAY HIS 47000 DOLLARS IN BACK TAXES I PAID MINE IN TIME "

Jefferson wrote on Jun 14, 2008 9:28 PM:

" McDermmitt is the best thing to happen to Hammond in thirty years. Look what your other city leaders are up to (Rudy Clay, Merrillville Town Counsel). He is trying to make Hammond a little less crapy than it is. And you ungrateful people don't even realize it "

Carsons cantrell and conspiracies wrote on Jun 13, 2008 4:33 PM:

" 165th and Indy will sort itself out in due time. Hammond had one rally, and many residents were there for it. So be careful who you talk about. Just because Dede-nothing supporters dont care about Hammond as much as the residents do, does not mean McD doesn't. And he proved it by intiating a rally to prove to Carsons owners how good an investment Hammond is. What would Dede-nothing have done?

Your theories about McD corruption are unfounded. Just like your constant rants of six figure pay offs to McD in the Cabelas deal, you are going on and on and on about how Cantrell will expose McD. You are a wishful thinker. You have no facts to back your arguments only conspiracies and accusations. You are placing McD much closer to Cantrell Sr than is actually true. You can tell me all the familial relationships in the world between canrell and McD, Doesn't mean McD is corrupt. Lots of politicals know cantrell, are all of them corrupt? You need to spend your retirement more productively. YourBeing Narcasistic! "

From a rd generation Hammond Resident wrote on Jun 13, 2008 4:21 PM:

" Yes naysayers, we should focus on real problems until they are completely eliminated, then move on to issues like traffic control. Naysayers unite! We will bring down the progressive Mcdermott regime. They have done too many things for Hammond and we know those things will not work! Everyone of the McDermott supporters and optimistic Hammond residents think tax dollars should be spent on improving Hammond. We know all of these improvements are smoke screens for the McDermott cohorts to line their pockets. Us naysayers aint stupid! We have just been out of power for 6 years. We no longer have the authority to do nothing. But dont you naysayers worry. We will soon chase McDermott off and get back to the good old days where Hammond did nothing for itself. That way was, is, and will always be better than the vast improvements weve seen since Dede-nothing left. Ya'll too-good, pretty boi, college edumacated Mcdermott supporters need to ride the next SS train outta town. Their aint room for no more of your improvements. And quit drawing new businesses too, daggumit. I ATTENDED KENWOOD/RILEY ELEM, GAVIT JUNIOR/SENIOR, and PUC. Team Hammond, or team Dede-nothing? "

and another thing.... wrote on Jun 13, 2008 4:14 PM:

" What was the woodmar mall doing while Dede-nothing was in office? OHHHHyeahhh, NOTHING. it Dede NOTHING. So tell me. Would you rather have an owner pay to tear that place town and make way for 21st century investment, or should we live in the past forever and keep the mall around until the very last store folds nad moves out. If that happened the owner would have lost the property and the city would have had to foot the bill to tear down the Woodmar "mall". If you ask me, as a SoHammond resident since 1988, I think Carson's should move from that site. Carson's would be much better off at the old Kmart site. The proposed development at the current woodmar site is not a good investment. That is in an industrial section of town. Who would want to locate a retail store across from factories? I would much rather be across from Cabela's and visible fromthe expressway. And thats just common sense. Sure, nothing is happening fast at 165th & indy, but atleast something is happening. Would you prefer McD Dede-nothing? "

nothing huh wrote on Jun 13, 2008 4:07 PM:

" Lower crime rates, new business investments, redundant gov't elimination, homeowner incentives, national recognition, revived hammond festival of the lakes, new 1/2 BILLion dollar casino, new streets everywhere you turn, new dorms at PUC, fair and honest police,.... Must I go on. I have attended Kenwood & Riley elementary, Gavit Middle and High School, as well as PUC. I now live and work in Hammond. I am a member of the Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce. I pay property taxes on a single family home, multiple rental units, and my small business. I am very appreciative of the improvement McD and his "Cromies" have accomplished since taking office. I was growing sick and tired of hearing my neighboring towns talk bad about us and having nothing to argue against them. Thay WERE right. Now I can stand up for my hometown of Hammond and point out the flaws their towns have or the benefits I get for living in Hammond. Yes, Hammond does have problems. No, we aren't going to settle for the stat quo any more. The same guy that writes on here every day obviously has another motive. "

Whoo hes clever wrote on Jun 13, 2008 3:40 PM:

" Excuse me but does this quote

"If you people put 1/4 of the effort that you do whining & complaining about McDermott into doing something constructive Hammond just might be a place worth living."

Not suggest that Hammond is now not a place worth living?

Sir.. none less than Thomas Jefferson called upon the populace to point out the folly of their government. So a greater mind than you or I considered it not whining but in fact great patriotism to protest

So TJ was a caveman I suppose "

kaye wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:06 PM:

" I am all for it - I think it is long overdue and not just in Hammond. Too many people drive too fast. In the last 15 years or so, drivers are getting more aggressive (road rage) etc. and they think they can do whatever they want behing the wheel. I bet you wouldn't give someone the finger if you were in the grocery store line with them and they cut in front of you, but people feel empowered behind the wheel of their vehicle. I say if you don't run the red light you will be fine, obey the traffic laws and be a good citizen whether the eye in the sky is watching or not because the next light you blow could be your last. "

Longer than years wrote on Jun 13, 2008 1:09 PM:

" To: question for McNitwit

Woodmar, or what was once woodmar mall has sat in the same condition for closer to 3 years. i love how the mayor or one of his family or cronies tries to pretend they are a hammond tax payer, giving him praise like those of us that really do live here see nothing going on all over town, what a joke our mayor the clown really is. "

Question for McMayor wrote on Jun 13, 2008 12:18 PM:

" When do you suppose you will begin to fulfill ANY of the "10 Promises" you advertised in the newspaper just prior to the last election? We're waiting to see even 1of them fulfilled.

Oh, and along those lines, whats going on with Woodmar Mall? Nothing has happened on the project for well over 2 years. I'll go out on a limb and say Carsons will leave and the mall site will be another vacant lot within the next 3 years. "

I Love McD wrote on Jun 13, 2008 11:55 AM:

" Nobody throws a useless rally for to try to keep a retailers i Hammond quite like our mayor. He doesn't have to explain why he was pals with a Bob Cantrell, a corrupt political figure recently convicted on multiple crimes. So what if he was in a law practice with John Cantrell, granted immunity to get his testimony. So what if Julie Cantrell hired the mayor's wife and in return the mayor gave a job to a Cantrell in-law. None of that matter becasse the mayor has not been indicted for anything, yet. "

THIS COMMENT IS VERY SARCASTIC wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:41 AM:

" Yes naysayers, we should focus on real problems until they are completely eliminated, then move on to issues like traffic control. Naysayers unite! We will bring down the progressive Mcdermott regime. They have done too many things for Hammond and we know those things will not work! Everyone of the McDermott supporters and optimistic Hammond residents think tax dollars should be spent on improving Hammond. We know all of these improvements are smoke screens for the McDermott cohorts to line their pockets. Us naysayers aint stupid! We have just been out of power for 6 years. We no longer have the authority to do nothing. But dont you naysayers worry. We will soon chase McDermott off and get back to the good old days where Hammond did nothing for itself. That way was, is, and will always be better than the vast improvements weve seen since Dede-nothing left. Ya'll too-good, pretty boi, college edumacated Mcdermott supporters need to ride the next SS train outta town. Their aint room for no more of your improvements. And quit drawing new businesses too, daggumit. I MAY BE YOUNG, BUT I REMEMBER 10 YEARS AGO IN HMD, AND IT STUNK. GO MCD! "

GO HAMMOND wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:03 AM:

" "McDermott for President" THANK YOU ...
THANK YOU. Finally an intelligent comment. No disrespect, no false accusations, just some positive, progressive thinking. I'm relieved to know there really are some people in Hammond who like where they live and cheer for progress. "

so... wrote on Jun 13, 2008 7:24 AM:

" ...if you don't ask for your day in court, your insurance won't go up & the fine won't go up ... sounds like strong arm tactics ... whatever happenned to the presumption of innocence??? and is daddy mcDimwit gonna get a piece of the action??? "

D wrote on Jun 12, 2008 4:27 PM:

" If Hammond does it we consider it greed and illegal. If Munster or Dyer does the same it is progressive and forward looking. "

B. Williams wrote on Jun 12, 2008 3:35 PM:

" I don't think this is a bad idea per se. I think the city needs to raise money and this could be a way to do that provided its done without shortening the time it takes for a light to go from yellow to red. In the winter, I have been proceeding through a light and it changed faster than anticipated from green to yellow. If I had jammed on the brakes I would have caused an accident by possible spinning out of control. People behind me have a greater chance to rear end me also in the winter. "

Dam wrote on Jun 12, 2008 2:58 PM:

" I guess I cant run red lights anymore "

Well now... wrote on Jun 12, 2008 2:51 PM:

" What will be called running a red light? Is it when you try to skate through on the yellow and you see it turn red as you just pass under it? Or is it like just about everyone here makes it sound like: the light has been red for 10 seconds and so who cares... I'm going through. Listen folks, it's NEVER the latter so don't make it sound like it is. If it were, that driver shouldn't be on the road because of their incompetence. Still, the whole thing had better be spelled out because we're going to hear of the stacks of notices delivered to unsuspecting drivers. "

To McDimwit for President wrote on Jun 12, 2008 1:47 PM:

" Yeah, that will happen, NOT!

He'll be doing well not to go to prison with Bob Cantrell. Birds of a feather do flock together and McMayor had his nose stuck further into Bobby's behind than any other politician of the last 10 years. "

McDermott for President wrote on Jun 12, 2008 1:10 PM:

" Where have all the whiners and complainers gone? They are in Hammond. If you people put 1/4 of the effort that you do whining & complaining about McDermott into doing something constructive Hammond just might be a place worth living. We are about to begin another year with great opportunities to move Hammond forward. The expansion of the boat at the lakeshore, a new Wal-Mart will be built, Menards is considering a redesign, red light safety cameras and there are other great projects. But the C.A.V.E. people (Critical About Virtually Everything) never see opportunity unless they personally benefit from it and will always be there to criticize. I don't see them coming up with better ideas. The best you C.A.V.E. people can due is sue the city, using your own tax dollars against yourselves, because it happened to rain a lot. Which by to way has nothing to with the Mayor. If you want lower taxes then don’t sue your own city DUH! Talk about selfish, ignorant and rude! "

wolfie wrote on Jun 12, 2008 12:56 PM:

" What are the legal status if the subject deceides to contest the ticket? chenk the indiana code. "

Yo complain complain wrote on Jun 12, 2008 12:21 PM:

" What new businesses do you refer to? Cabelas? We all know there was some profiteering going on there. What will McCriminal do when Bobby begins to sing about some of the illicit activities the mayor has been up to for the past 6 years? McDimwit may fool some of the people but to others he is nothing more than a convict in waiting. "

McFan wrote on Jun 12, 2008 12:15 PM:

" To: Ernest:

Now that was funny! It's true but also really funny. Hey maybe you could do a bit of stand up at the next Carsons rally? "

Yikes wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:56 AM:

" It's finally happened: Hammond is officially a red light district. How appropriate. "

complain complain wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:35 AM:

Rick A wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:25 AM:

" To Dan Kmak comments, the mayors admininstrations does not make money attacking gang, drug or school problems. $100 fines equals pocket money for his "gang" "

WHATEVER wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:23 AM:

" OBVIOUSLY HAMMOND IS NOT TOO BAD, IF IT WAS THAT BAD YOU WOULDN'T LIVE 5-10 MINUTES AWAY IN MUNSTER, ST JOHN, SCHERERVILLE OR HIGHLAND!! OPEN YOUR EYES "

ernest wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:20 AM:

" I find it ironic that Cantrells best friend anf partner spends time worrying about other people breaking the law. "

No Andrew wrote on Jun 12, 2008 10:10 AM:

" Its the greedy democrats that want more money in their pockets. I knew Bush would get blamed some how for this. Like he even knows where NWI is! "

whats wrong with u people wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:47 AM:

" This could save a life! Maybe even your life. People are hurt or killed all of the time because people just run red lights. This is to help protect you because someone who normally runs the light doesnt wanna get a ticket. And all u people can do is whine how stupid it is. How pathetic! This is why people frown upon Hammond. Because you are on here whining about this when u could be doing something to make your community better. Just find something worth complaining about, dont run redlights and this wont even effect you. "

Frank wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:44 AM:

" Too many people don't know how to drive and need training! Young and old think they only have to almost stop at stop sign and don't look at who has right of way or respect other drivers.
It's rules we could and should learn and teach.
Instead of tickets make classroom training mandatory or be ticketed. "

Andrew wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:28 AM:

" We have a mayor and a city council who all think it is okay to break the law by installing these cameras. Kinda sounds like the Bush-Cheney administration to me: do what you want, and worry about the Consitutionality of it later.

What a messed up world we live in. "

to Hammond wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:23 AM:

" Here's an idea, if you don't want to rear end someone- STOP FOLLOWING SO CLOSE AND SLOW DOWN!! You're one of the reasons we need cameras in Hammond. "

The Cat wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:20 AM:

" What else are we going to copy from Illinois? We now have increased our state and county taxes (like chicago). When we vote to make Indiana better than other states, we are actually putting people in office that are doing more harm than good. Lord have mercy on us. In the past few years,our taxes have gone so high, that going to the grocery store and buying clothes and other needs is impossible. "

To Hammond wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:17 AM:

" THEN DON'T FOLLOW TO CLOSELY!! DUH! HAMMOND IS A TRASH TOWN ANYWAY. WHO CARES WHAT THEY DO THERE. LOOKS NO DIFFERENT THAN GARY. I HAVE BEEN ALL OVER HAMMOND. GLOOMY AND DEPRESSING JUST LIKE GARY. "

Coyote is right wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:14 AM:

" If you want to improve the safety of intersections, education is the best long term solution. Lawmakers should all have to study human behavior. People will actually increase running lights at intersections without cameras because they know they won't get caught. We should be putting the money into an education campaign, not another third party outsourcing scam. Running local government is not all about producing income, it is about making decisions for the greater good of the community. "

To Hammond Resident wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:05 AM:

" Ever think that ever cop not stuck sitting watching intersections is a cop that has time to go after the serious offenders in the City. Think before you type. "

Illinois Tags wrote on Jun 12, 2008 9:01 AM:

" What about all the people living in Indiana with Illinois tags on their cars, where will their tickets be sent? Obviously they lied to the BMV in Illinois to get tags for a fictitious address. "

Vacant wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:57 AM:

" Ok, where will they be, so I can avoid those intersections. "

Shortfall in property taxes wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:57 AM:

" Rather than cut expenses the mayor plans on instituting several new money making scams, er, ideas to make up for the city's loss of revenue. He has to make up for the money that the city will not be getting from property owners living in other areas of Lake County. Remember, Hammond home owners get no property tax relief for 12 years, so he figures he can squeeze us with these cameras. I would bet McMayor's friends and family will never get a ticket sent to them even if they blow a light completely. This is the man that defended the actions of his buddy, Bobby Cantrell. "

Good wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:21 AM:

" Glad to hear it, scare the gang bangers and drug dealers out of Hammond as well as the speeders and driving too fast truck drivers, if you drive like a normal human being, this won't affect you at all. "

Stupid wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:06 AM:

" So if someone steals/borrows your car and runs redlights, you are on the hook for $100 per violation. How fair? 'sarcasm' "

........ wrote on Jun 12, 2008 7:51 AM:

" Oh I see Mr. Clay is riding the coat tails of Mcdermot. Now Gary wants one too. I gaurantee someone in Gary will start pocketing that money. "

Hammond wrote on Jun 12, 2008 7:41 AM:

" Now the number of crashes at the intersections will increase because drivers will be slamming on the brakes when the light turns yellow. I think that a bad situation has just been made worse. I never go as soon as the light turns green. I always check the cross traffic to make sure that all the cars have stopped. But I can't read minds and I won't be able to tell if the driver in front of me has decided to brake on the yellow until it's too late. "

coyote wrote on Jun 12, 2008 7:04 AM:

" Red light entrapment is a bad idea. These lights need to have longer yellows and delayed signals. Additionally....violators need to be given warning notices before actual tickets are issued to constructively re-educate driving habits. "

GOOD wrote on Jun 12, 2008 6:32 AM:

" Stop those people before the kill someone! Do you know how many times I've seen a semi blow a light going fast, and they get away with it. However I cannot understand how Robert Markovich could say he supports it, yet voted against it. Sounds two faced. "

Dan Kmak wrote on Jun 12, 2008 6:31 AM:

" Of all the pressing problems in the city we attack illegal turns. How about gangs, theft or drugs? How about doing something about Hammonds poor school rating. Let's protest. Save the money and let us do something important. "

Wet Hen wrote on Jun 12, 2008 6:30 AM:

" Another reason not to visit Hammond
Running a red light is a parking offense?
A private company is running it. What pols cousin owns it and how much is he kicking back
BAH "

sounds great wrote on Jun 12, 2008 5:53 AM:

" Hey don't like it then don't drive thur red lights its that simple. Yellow means slow down not speed up "

stupid wrote on Jun 12, 2008 4:10 AM:

" this is just more money in McDimwits pockets. smh. "

Hammond Resident wrote on Jun 12, 2008 1:19 AM:

" PEOPLE RUNNING RED LIGHTS IS NOT HAMMONDS BIGGEST PROBLEM. "

Back to story 64 comment(s)

Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.

Marketplace

Sections

Services

Other Publications

Search