- Font Size:
- Default font size
- Larger font size
BY BILL DOLAN
bdolan@nwitimes.com
219.662.5328 | Tuesday, August 12, 2008 | (93 comment(s))
CROWN POINT | A judge bent on instructing the public to fulfill jury obligations got his point across Monday morning with the reluctant help of a Cedar Lake man.
As part of his sentence for being a jury duty scofflaw, Michael Leibengood stood outside the Lake County Government Complex holding a sign saying, "I failed to appear for jury duty." It was a public lesson for prospective jurors entering the courthouse.
Lake Criminal Court Judge Thomas P. Stefaniak ordered Leibengood's public display of remorse last week after refusing to believe Leibengood failed to serve on a murder trial jury in late May because he had a flat tire.
Stefaniak couldn't be reached Monday for comment.
"No one is exempt from jury duty. Not even me," Chief Lake Superior Court Judge John Pera said Monday of the sentence.
Pera said he wasn't involved in the Leibengood case and couldn't comment on Stefaniak's decision, but judges have made jury duty as convenient and fair as possible because the courts need the public's help in dispensing justice.
Rich Cox, of Hobart, who was on jury call this week, said, "At first I didn't understand what was going on. I thought the guy was some kind of protester."
Cox said this was the second time in about three decades he has been summoned as a potential juror, and "I always wondered what would happen if you didn't go. Now I know."
Joe Giorgio, also of Hobart and another prospective juror, said, "I talked to him during a break. He told me he got off pretty easy."
Leibengood said Monday he had just gotten off his night shift at a steel mill to show up outside the courthouse front door from 7:30 to 9 a.m. -- a time when the people called into this week's criminal court jury pool had to appear.
He didn't appear upset and chatted with people who asked him what he was doing.
He said his mother made his sign for him.
Back to story 93 comment(s)
- It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
- It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
- It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
- It promoted violence or illegal acts.
- It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.
In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.
For more information please read our Terms of Service.




Dumb wrote on Aug 19, 2008 2:27 PM:
ITS THE LAW wrote on Aug 19, 2008 1:01 PM:
to ITS THE LAW wrote on Aug 19, 2008 8:56 AM:
Rocket Scientist wrote on Aug 19, 2008 12:08 AM:
I am like Lake County Politicians wrote on Aug 18, 2008 1:55 PM:
ITS THE LAW wrote on Aug 18, 2008 1:08 PM:
Cindy wrote on Aug 18, 2008 12:00 PM:
Darien wrote on Aug 18, 2008 8:42 AM:
A guy who might find you guilty because he,she is some smart a$$ who just wants to be ornery?
You certainly would want someone who has an interest in justice, not because he/she is forced to be a juror. "
RE Hmmmm wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:46 PM:
Hmm wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:10 PM:
Dear Tiffany wrote on Aug 17, 2008 5:20 PM:
RE unemployed juror. wrote on Aug 17, 2008 4:07 PM:
Schererville Resident wrote on Aug 17, 2008 3:25 PM:
unemployed Juror wrote on Aug 16, 2008 9:35 PM:
It's a little extra income for the retired. Yes, gas prices are high, but the unemployed could use a few extra bucks too... "
Jim wrote on Aug 16, 2008 10:24 AM:
griffith resident wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:04 PM:
unwanted tumorous growth wrote on Aug 15, 2008 8:27 AM:
and they call this child an "unwanted tumorous growth". How callous and inhumane...
and then they try to kill him or her.
But sometimes, the abortionists are not successful and the baby makes it out alive and starts crying. But Barry Obama said, "we can't let those babies live, that might be a slippery slope if we let them live outside the womb, next thing you know we might not be allowed to kill them inside the womb anymore".
So he spoke out forcefully against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act when he was a senator in Illinois.
I am fed up with the sanctimonious, self-righteous sermonizing of the radical pro-death left, whose religion is The State and Liberalism, and whose sacrament is abortion. This is not about you – stay out of the poor innocent baby boy or girl's life and let them live! "
Drater wrote on Aug 15, 2008 8:04 AM:
Okay wrote on Aug 15, 2008 7:18 AM:
That's the problem with people like you. You'll find any reason you can to talk about this subject of controversy and again I will tell you to get a life!
You were obviously too lazy to read the article so I will break it down for you:
It's about a guy that skipped out on jury duty so now the judge is making him hold up a big gaudy sign(saying what he did) in front of the courthouse as punishment.
Crap! I think I may have made that too long for you... Maybe I should've put it on a sign.. then you might get it. "
nlb wrote on Aug 15, 2008 6:56 AM:
Too Late - Fixed wrote on Aug 14, 2008 10:49 PM:
to to Scarlet Letter and everyone that agrees wrote on Aug 14, 2008 6:52 PM:
"Deep down, in some still vital area of human knowledge within you, the place where you just know things, you have got to know that no political party primarily funded, supported and led by fierce pro-abortionists, by people whose great interest in life is seeing to it that the right to kill infants is retained, can long endure. Nothing can long stand on a foundation like that. Nothing."
I know it worries you when people point out your practice of killing unborn children, but that doesn't mean we should stop talking about it. How about child molesters and cop killers, should we stop talking about it because the offenders tell us to stop talking about their offense? "
OFFENDED wrote on Aug 14, 2008 5:10 PM:
How offensive. I wonder how many people serve on Jury's who are NOT alive or even American Citizens for that matter. I wonder how these records are kept and how often are they updated. Seems like a mess to me. "
tiretrax wrote on Aug 14, 2008 3:34 PM:
to Scarlet Letter and everyone that agrees wrote on Aug 14, 2008 3:04 PM:
Jury Duty twice wrote on Aug 14, 2008 2:51 PM:
Rocket Scientist wrote on Aug 14, 2008 12:41 PM:
What the court pays a juror is NOTHING compared to what people lose when they must call off work to be there. Then there's the cost of fuel to get there, etc..
If they call on someone for jury duty, They should reimburse the juror for ALL lost wages and fuel costs. Why should someone be paid less than what their time and effort is worth? Some people cannot afford the loss of even $20 of a paycheck.
If they expect people to give up their time against their will to serve on a jury, they must compensate them fairly. How can you expect people NOT to be upset when they get one of those cards in the mail. All it means to them is lost pay and next to nothing in return from the courts. $30 a day is laughable... That should be hourly, not daily. "
never wrote on Aug 14, 2008 12:13 PM:
If one does not want to be a juror then you should know what to say to not be chosen. "
LAW CLERK wrote on Aug 13, 2008 6:59 PM:
tiretrax wrote on Aug 13, 2008 6:14 PM:
Weird wrote on Aug 13, 2008 3:58 PM:
But yes, if you are starving and unable to feed your family, it IS easy to get out of duty. When you're asked for your views on various issues just announce strong and vehement views... I assure you one side or the other will strike you. "
CSDYER wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:25 PM:
Glazed Ham wrote on Aug 13, 2008 12:05 PM:
to dont get it wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:53 AM:
More directly, if you were charged with a crime, would you want a jury of your peers?
We don't have the draft. Other than taxes, there really is no other responsibility like this that our country asks of us. Is serving on a jury really more than you can handle? That's not only selfish, it's un-American! "
I got your civic duty wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:42 AM:
Got Gas Money wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:34 AM:
dont get it wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:11 AM:
SENIOR CITIZEN wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:08 AM:
JURORS SHOULD NOT BE JUST CHOSEN FROM PEOPLE WHO GOT A CARD IN THE MAIL. THEY SHOULD ALSO GO THROUGH A SEMINAR, FOR WHICH THEY ARE PAID FOR, IN ORDER TO LEARN HOW TO BE A JUROR. MANY CITIZENS CANNOT SPEAK ENGLISH PROPERLY AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR LAWS.
THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY AND IF SOMEONE DOES NOT WANT TO SERVE, THEN THEY SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO SERVE!
I BELIEVE THE JUDGE WAS WRONG. "
Big Kielbasa wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:01 AM:
It is our civic duty wrote on Aug 13, 2008 7:44 AM:
And how did some of you make this about abortion or Obama? Please try to focus. "
Rocket Scientist wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:55 PM:
To Scarlet Letter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:31 PM:
Sign for McCain wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:14 PM:
sign for Obama wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:31 PM:
to MMM wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:29 PM:
"Deep down, in some still vital area of human knowledge within you, the place where you just know things, you have got to know that no political party primarily funded, supported and led by fierce pro-abortionists, by people whose great interest in life is seeing to it that the right to kill infants is retained, can long endure. Nothing can long stand on a foundation like that. Nothing." "
IRene wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:17 PM:
you are first told that one must weigh all the facts in the case. Then at the end of the trial you are told, what you can or can not consider.
That takes away any judgement you have. Once the decision is screened through all the "do-nots" It does not seem worth the days spent reaching any decision. "Why Show up ! "
you just reach the only decision ALLOWED within the given guiedlines.
Jurers are the screen the lawyers and judges wash their hands on.No wonder , many cases need to be tried again. "
MMM wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:34 PM:
Darien wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:07 PM:
Why force a citizen to be a juror if his/her heart is not into it?
Would you want to be judged by someone who doesn't want to be there and may make a poor decision against you on that basis? "
no support wrote on Aug 12, 2008 3:49 PM:
JD wrote on Aug 12, 2008 3:36 PM:
Hammerhead wrote on Aug 12, 2008 3:18 PM:
Anti-Stefaniak... wrote on Aug 12, 2008 2:00 PM:
Mad wrote on Aug 12, 2008 1:51 PM:
Draconian wrote on Aug 12, 2008 1:36 PM:
Driving from Cedar Lake to Crown Point isn't exactly a walk in the park. (It's a long drive)
If the judge wanted to establish proper grounds for punishing the dude then Stefaniak should've asked for a receipt for the tire repair with a time stamp on it.
Besides...there are tons of people that show for jury duty. I am confident saying another juror could've easily replaced Mr. Leibengood.
Thank goodness I live in Chicago. "
Just do what I did wrote on Aug 12, 2008 1:24 PM:
David from Gary wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:52 AM:
As for the supposed $30 (it was $40 a day when I showed up in 2001); I was told that employers are supposed to pay for that person's wages. I don't know if my employer paid for my co-worker's wages, but some employers have different ways of paying workers. For most truck drivers, they only get paid when their truck is on the road delivering product. Other employers pay workers piece rate for stuff that needs assembling. Those are 2 cases where people don't get paid if they don't work. "
what wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:49 AM:
government job security wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:38 AM:
Good wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:37 AM:
Dumb ruling wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:35 AM:
to To scarlet letter. wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:35 AM:
I am not a Christian, but I am an American with common sense. I don't think it is right to snuff out innocent human life, for moral reasons. Also, I am against activist liberal judges making new laws and implementing their own personal beliefs in infanticide, by ignoring the US Constitution and making up new laws. They should stick to their role and let the people and the states decide such issues.
Why, you think Jesus would go around killing unborn children and condoning this and voting for people who condone it? "
Winfield Scott wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:34 AM:
1. can't take the time off work
2. don't have childcare means
or any other LEGITIMATE reason as to why one cannot serve.
Having never been called for JD, I'm just speaking out on behalf of those I know that have, and how I'd feek if I were called. "
lolz wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:26 AM:
you want me to be a part of the legal system? then PAY ME LIKE I'M PART OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM!!! "
MPPS wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:16 AM:
Citizen wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:05 AM:
Why serve wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:39 AM:
Then, if you find someone guilty of a criminal act, the judge will most likely give them a slap on the wrist and set them free. So, I take a pay cut I can't afford so that a weak, illy livered liberal judge can the the person free? I don't think so Stefaniak, you care to pay my bills? Didn't think so. "
To scarlet letter.... wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:35 AM:
I think wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:22 AM:
We're soppose to sand as one not make a mocary of the people.... "
Working Class wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:21 AM:
Merrillville man wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:13 AM:
Funny wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:54 AM:
G Davis wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:41 AM:
Aaron-Munster wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:10 AM:
Why not sentence him to.. wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:09 AM:
I agree with Scarlet Letter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:07 AM:
Way to go wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:54 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:52 AM:
tiffany wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:46 AM:
Stefaniak and Bozo wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:36 AM:
to Scarlet Letter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:35 AM:
To Scarlett Letter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:35 AM:
I agree with Daniel K wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:16 AM:
VALPO RESIDENT wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:58 AM:
Working Class Penalized wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:58 AM:
Obamas sign wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:51 AM:
On the back it should say "I am the new Neville Chamberlain, I will appease the world's tyrants and dictators!" "
Thats it wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:40 AM:
lmn wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:35 AM:
To Daniel wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:33 AM:
No way Daniel wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:24 AM:
waste of time wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:19 AM:
Scarlet Letter wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:11 AM:
Ruth Bader Ginsgburg should have to hold a sign "I think the US Constitution is an impediment to my racial socialist agenda!" "
Funny wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:44 AM:
daniel kmak wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:22 AM: